Farm Subsidy information
10th District of North Carolina
(Rep. Patrick McHenry)
Total Subsidies in 10th District of North Carolina (Rep. Patrick McHenry), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 238
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 10th District of North Carolina (Rep. Patrick McHenry) totaled $1,626,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $5,512 | |
42 | , | $5,510 | |
43 | M Edward Chilton II | Ararat, NC 27007 | $5,493 |
44 | John Bert Cockerham Jr | Mount Airy, NC 27030 | $5,441 |
45 | Jesse J Brown | East Bend, NC 27018 | $5,405 |
46 | Mitchell Farm Inc | Pinnacle, NC 27043 | $5,305 |
47 | George K Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $5,178 |
48 | Phillip A Cave | Elkin, NC 28621 | $5,144 |
49 | David Lee Mckinney | King, NC 27021 | $4,975 |
50 | M & M Produce Inc | Vale, NC 28168 | $4,882 |
51 | Merritt Family Operations LLC | Dobson, NC 27017 | $4,861 |
52 | E Jerome Mauldin | Hamptonville, NC 27020 | $4,844 |
53 | James F Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $4,836 |
54 | Brown Mule Farm LLC | East Bend, NC 27018 | $4,819 |
55 | Smith Farms | Boonville, NC 27011 | $4,768 |
56 | Jeffrey Adam Mitchell | Pinnacle, NC 27043 | $4,682 |
57 | Barry Dinkins | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $4,646 |
58 | Eugene A Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $4,559 |
59 | Irvin L Pack | Lawsonville, NC 27022 | $4,445 |
60 | Calderon Peppers Inc | Vale, NC 28168 | $4,363 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”