Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,475
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $21,364,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rocky Top Dairy LLC | Hobbs, NM 88240 | $563,434 |
| 2 | Steven Lyles Farms Inc | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $511,906 |
| 3 | Chile River Inc | Salem, NM 87941 | $493,545 |
| 4 | Dominguez Farms Inc | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $361,523 |
| 5 | Cheyenne Dairy | Dexter, NM 88230 | $361,523 |
| 6 | Pancho Salopek & Sons Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $321,092 |
| 7 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $291,974 |
| 8 | Lone Star State Bank Of West Texa ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $287,070 |
| 9 | High Lonesome Dairy | Clovis, NM 88101 | $280,188 |
| 10 | Masson Farms Of New Mexico, Inc. | Radium Springs, NM 88054 | $250,000 |
| 11 | Corrales Dairy LLC | Roswell, NM 88202 | $248,029 |
| 12 | Sideline Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $241,015 |
| 13 | Brand West Dairy LLC | Energy, TX 76452 | $241,015 |
| 14 | Desertland Dairy LLC | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $241,015 |
| 15 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $219,865 |
| 16 | N S Landaverde Cattle Ranch Inc | Dexter, NM 88230 | $189,419 |
| 17 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $174,411 |
| 18 | David N Bergen & Maria Martens Jv | Seminole, TX 79360 | $173,138 |
| 19 | Sunset Dairy LLC | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $156,216 |
| 20 | Majestic Farms Inc | Hatch, NM 87937 | $151,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf