Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of New Mexico
(Rep. Ben Lujan)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,652
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $38,134,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | , | $86,205 | |
102 | Lisa Runyan | House, NM 88121 | $86,122 |
103 | Alfredo Sanchez | San Jon, NM 88434 | $86,100 |
104 | James R Burns | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $85,131 |
105 | Grant Smith | Springfield, CO 81073 | $84,984 |
106 | Cedar Rush Farms | Melrose, NM 88124 | $82,232 |
107 | Perez Cattle Company LLC | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $82,135 |
108 | Bernilda Marrujo | Mora, NM 87732 | $81,523 |
109 | Minnie Butte Corporation | Clayton, NM 88415 | $80,037 |
110 | Jeff G Cornell | Wagon Mound, NM 87752 | $79,537 |
111 | Barry L Poling Corporation | Texline, TX 79087 | $78,643 |
112 | , | $76,851 | |
113 | Yvonne Trujillo | Cimarron, NM 87714 | $75,758 |
114 | , | $75,654 | |
115 | Kenneth E Dellinger | Clayton, NM 88415 | $75,556 |
116 | James O Bar - Land & Cattle LLC | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $73,672 |
117 | San Jon Ranch LLC | San Jon, NM 88434 | $73,122 |
118 | Lehmer Jeffers | Gladstone, NM 88424 | $72,852 |
119 | Dodge Farms Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $72,091 |
120 | Elliot Lloyd Bachicha | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $71,897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”