Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 112
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $74,351 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Papas Dairy LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $7,322 |
| 2 | Adon Farms Operations LLC | Potsdam, NY 13676 | $5,845 |
| 3 | Bilow Farms LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $5,254 |
| 4 | Carsada Dairy LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $3,972 |
| 5 | Demick Farms LLC | Hammond, NY 13646 | $2,953 |
| 6 | Trainer Farm LLC | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $2,744 |
| 7 | L. T. Smith & Sons Farms LLC | Canton, NY 13617 | $2,307 |
| 8 | Dans Dairy LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $2,128 |
| 9 | Flack Farms, LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $2,125 |
| 10 | Teriele Family Dairy LLC | Canton, NY 13617 | $2,083 |
| 11 | Logue Farms Inc | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $2,059 |
| 12 | Keystone Dairy | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $1,637 |
| 13 | Metcalf Farms LLC | Constable, NY 12926 | $1,603 |
| 14 | Five Mile Farm | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $1,503 |
| 15 | Richard Eakins Dba Norco Farms | Hopkinton, NY 12965 | $1,475 |
| 16 | Galilee Farms LLC | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $1,393 |
| 17 | Harrigan Brothers Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $1,378 |
| 18 | Stargo Dairy Farm LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $1,365 |
| 19 | Hy-view Acres | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $1,365 |
| 20 | Donald Ellsworth | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $1,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf