Margin Protection Program in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 190
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $44,465 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sjf Farm | Gouverneur, NY 13642 | $6,061 |
| 2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $625 |
| 3 | Kelly Farms | Rensselaer Falls, NY 13680 | $609 |
| 4 | Metcalf Farms LLC | Constable, NY 12926 | $607 |
| 5 | Monica Farms LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $605 |
| 6 | Lisbon Centre Farms LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $605 |
| 7 | Shipman Farms LLC | Burke, NY 12917 | $603 |
| 8 | L. T. Smith & Sons Farms LLC | Canton, NY 13617 | $600 |
| 9 | Kenneth C Corscadden | Richville, NY 13681 | $598 |
| 10 | Dean G Akins Elizabeth W & Mark | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $590 |
| 11 | Donald Ellsworth | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $585 |
| 12 | Cruikshank Farms LLC | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $585 |
| 13 | Sunset Lake Farm No 2 LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $582 |
| 14 | Mr Randall Ooms | Constable, NY 12926 | $571 |
| 15 | Brandy Brook Haven Farms LLC | Madrid, NY 13660 | $569 |
| 16 | Brockway Hilltop Farms LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $565 |
| 17 | Gotham Family Farm LLC | Hermon, NY 13652 | $564 |
| 18 | Dori B's Farm | De Peyster, NY 13633 | $563 |
| 19 | C&m Dairy LLC | Madrid, NY 13660 | $560 |
| 20 | Stargo Dairy Farm LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $559 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf