Emergency Conservation Program in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin) totaled $384,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | River Bend Partners, LLC | Jenks, OK 74037 | $49,851 |
| 2 | Mary Ann Haley Cosner | Gans, OK 74936 | $37,963 |
| 3 | Roberts Family Farm LLC | Grove, OK 74344 | $22,545 |
| 4 | Jansen Investments LLC | Fort Smith, AR 72916 | $21,551 |
| 5 | Cameran Hines | Afton, OK 74331 | $20,430 |
| 6 | Hugh Gordon | Bluejacket, OK 74333 | $18,657 |
| 7 | Troy Gammon | Atoka, OK 74525 | $17,934 |
| 8 | Jeremy Ryan West | Jay, OK 74346 | $17,433 |
| 9 | Harley Uber Jr | Atoka, OK 74525 | $15,159 |
| 10 | Jackie Jones | Wyandotte, OK 74370 | $14,451 |
| 11 | Tom F Cosner | Gans, OK 74936 | $14,279 |
| 12 | James S Beck | Grove, OK 74344 | $14,003 |
| 13 | Jared Miller | Miami, OK 74354 | $11,255 |
| 14 | Philip Bruce Matchell | Jay, OK 74346 | $10,797 |
| 15 | Diane Cook | Wyandotte, OK 74370 | $10,701 |
| 16 | Cody A Sloan | Gore, OK 74435 | $8,025 |
| 17 | Buster Drain | Marble City, OK 74945 | $7,804 |
| 18 | Foster Johnson Jr | Stigler, OK 74462 | $7,712 |
| 19 | Winston Dunaway | Jay, OK 74346 | $7,401 |
| 20 | Timothy D Wilson | Welch, OK 74369 | $7,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf