Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 5,913
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $29,248,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | County Line Farms General Partnership | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $40,706 |
82 | Dallas Ray Mcphail | Mountain Park, OK 73559 | $40,337 |
83 | Jean Ann Mcphail | Mountain Park, OK 73559 | $40,337 |
84 | James David George- David George Revocable Trust | Vienna, VA 22181 | $40,260 |
85 | Kevin Nightengale | Cordell, OK 73632 | $40,018 |
86 | Larry Sager Rev Tr | Beaver, OK 73932 | $39,977 |
87 | Silent Bliss Inc | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $39,932 |
88 | Johnnie Bert Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $39,889 |
89 | Gary Wedel | Cordell, OK 73632 | $39,660 |
90 | Mark Denton | Dacoma, OK 73731 | $39,630 |
91 | Trent D Watson | Forgan, OK 73938 | $39,615 |
92 | Dale Naylor | Balko, OK 73931 | $39,213 |
93 | Sandhill Farms Inc | Tyrone, OK 73951 | $39,198 |
94 | Butch Wherritt | Custer City, OK 73639 | $39,185 |
95 | Ed Farms LLC | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $38,980 |
96 | Steve Frantz | Beaver, OK 73932 | $38,976 |
97 | Nicholas Levi Black | Dill City, OK 73641 | $38,925 |
98 | Neal Percival Jr | Hopeton, OK 73746 | $38,843 |
99 | Rod Carver | Elk City, OK 73648 | $38,808 |
100 | Jeffrey Lee Lancaster | Dacoma, OK 73731 | $38,796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”