Grasslands Reserve Program in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $331,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mayer Legacy LLC | Guymon, OK 73942 | $49,997 |
| 2 | Dale Bliss | Oklahoma City, OK 73170 | $27,317 |
| 3 | Ruby J Hughes | Aline, OK 73716 | $22,061 |
| 4 | Don C Hughes | Aline, OK 73716 | $22,061 |
| 5 | Jack & Verdeen L Slatten Family Lmtd Ptn | Fort Worth, TX 76179 | $16,695 |
| 6 | Janet Sue Stevens | Edmond, OK 73013 | $15,498 |
| 7 | Wilma - Mayo Rev Trust June Mayo | Beaver, OK 73932 | $14,360 |
| 8 | Lazy V E Ranch | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $13,200 |
| 9 | Rose Blunk | Alva, OK 73717 | $12,628 |
| 10 | Thomas E Barber | Arnett, OK 73832 | $10,791 |
| 11 | Taylor P Jones | Arnett, OK 73832 | $8,829 |
| 12 | R C Brown LLC | Alva, OK 73717 | $8,282 |
| 13 | Johnny W Owens | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $7,408 |
| 14 | Jl Bud Clark Irrv Trust | Alva, OK 73717 | $6,650 |
| 15 | Jesse W James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $6,519 |
| 16 | Gayla J James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $6,519 |
| 17 | Little Beaver LLC | Medford, OK 73759 | $5,879 |
| 18 | Pamela Kay Hayes Irrevocable Trus | Edmond, OK 73013 | $5,812 |
| 19 | Linda L Williamson | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $5,805 |
| 20 | Jane Payne - Holton And Jane Payne Rev Inter Vivos | Shidler, OK 74652 | $5,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf