Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 252
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $469,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bank Of Kremlin | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $23,185 |
2 | Michael Nordwald | Kansas City, MO 64157 | $20,118 |
3 | Michael E Murphy | Marshall, OK 73056 | $18,224 |
4 | James Clyde Mitchell | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $17,098 |
5 | Sethca, LLC | Perry, OK 73077 | $16,094 |
6 | Gary Williams | Red Rock, OK 74651 | $15,158 |
7 | Peetoom Farms Jv | Nardin, OK 74646 | $12,646 |
8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $9,593 |
9 | Jda Land & Cattle Company LLC | Stockbridge, GA 30281 | $9,397 |
10 | Jason W Lesh | Morrison, OK 73061 | $9,196 |
11 | Chuck Murdock 2009 Trust | Boise City, OK 73933 | $8,434 |
12 | Rusty Murdock | Boise City, OK 73933 | $8,434 |
13 | Rannie Gale Luper | Mountain View, OK 73062 | $7,847 |
14 | Bobby Landreth | Watonga, OK 73772 | $6,770 |
15 | Central National Bank & Trust Of ** | Enid, OK 73701 | $6,580 |
16 | Carson Moss | Vici, OK 73859 | $6,126 |
17 | Bouse Family LLC | Waynoka, OK 73860 | $6,069 |
18 | Badger Creek Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $5,720 |
19 | Robert Holsted | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $5,203 |
20 | Top Cat Land And Cattle | Coyle, OK 73027 | $4,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>