Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $664,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palombo Fishing Corp | Newport, RI 02840 | $245,448 |
| 2 | Spencer Fish And Lobster | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $59,040 |
| 3 | Mataronas Lobster Co Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $49,245 |
| 4 | Sutton Enterprises | Newport, RI 02840 | $29,261 |
| 5 | Cockeast Fisheries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $25,242 |
| 6 | Two Brothers Fisheries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $23,570 |
| 7 | David Iglesias | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $23,330 |
| 8 | Alison Rose Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $22,684 |
| 9 | Grey Dog Fisheries | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $21,508 |
| 10 | Terminator Fisheries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $20,525 |
| 11 | Ocean Harvest Inc | Newport, RI 02840 | $18,721 |
| 12 | Sakonnet Point Fisheries LLC | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $14,391 |
| 13 | Ace Lobster Co Inc | Newport, RI 02840 | $14,237 |
| 14 | Violet Fish & Trap Company | Middletown, RI 02842 | $11,575 |
| 15 | Shirley Ann Inc | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $10,615 |
| 16 | Finast Kind Inc | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $10,123 |
| 17 | Kevin Sullivan | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $9,643 |
| 18 | James Mataronas III | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $8,894 |
| 19 | Seamus Sullivan | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $8,212 |
| 20 | First Light Fisheries Inc | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $7,783 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf