Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Rhode Island
(Rep. James Langevin)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 79
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $5,297,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | East Beach Oyster Company LLC | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $1,402,191 |
2 | Harry F Whilden III | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $455,422 |
3 | Shellfish For You, LLC | Westerly, RI 02891 | $428,085 |
4 | East Beach Farms LLC | South Kingstown, RI 02879 | $397,453 |
5 | Rocky Rhode Oyster Co, LLC | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $320,814 |
6 | Walrus And Carpenter Oysters, LLC | Providence, RI 02909 | $313,518 |
7 | Finca Faisan Inc | Des Moines, IA 50311 | $295,967 |
8 | , | $258,829 | |
9 | Rome Point LLC | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $256,319 |
10 | Mooresfield Oyster Farm LLC | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $197,576 |
11 | Allen Harbor Oyster Inc | Saunderstown, RI 02874 | $185,344 |
12 | , | $124,541 | |
13 | Quonnie Oyster Co Inc | Wakefield, RI 02880 | $100,423 |
14 | A Joseph Sprague | Block Island, RI 02807 | $68,441 |
15 | David W Carpenter | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $61,433 |
16 | Jeffrey Farrell | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $44,834 |
17 | Sodco Inc | Slocum, RI 02877 | $42,865 |
18 | Vincent P Confreda | Warwick, RI 02888 | $38,218 |
19 | , | $31,397 | |
20 | Confreda Farms And Produce | Hope, RI 02831 | $29,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>