Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman) totaled $61,285 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ronald H Stephenson | Chester, SC 29706 | $6,682 |
2 | Strait Farm LLC | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $5,508 |
3 | Carolina Cotton LLC | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $5,309 |
4 | Cotton Hills Farm LLC | Chester, SC 29706 | $5,108 |
5 | Kemp Summerfield Wilson | Chester, SC 29706 | $3,606 |
6 | Joe S Gaston Jr | Richburg, SC 29729 | $3,366 |
7 | H J Millen Jr | Chester, SC 29706 | $3,146 |
8 | Joey Wilson | Chester, SC 29706 | $3,138 |
9 | Richard M Roach | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $2,279 |
10 | William H Nance | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $2,023 |
11 | Hugh J Harshaw III | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $1,893 |
12 | P William Aycock Jr | Gastonia, NC 28054 | $1,688 |
13 | Boyd Farms | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $1,497 |
14 | Clifton Earl Thrailkill Jr | Fort Lawn, SC 29714 | $1,396 |
15 | James W Crowder Iv | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $1,268 |
16 | Michael A Nance | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $1,246 |
17 | William R Thomson | Sharon, SC 29742 | $1,198 |
18 | Allen L Beer | Richburg, SC 29729 | $1,071 |
19 | Nell Thomas Vaneverdingen | York, SC 29745 | $914 |
20 | Ann S Mcnerney | Chester, SC 29706 | $887 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>