Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 146
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn) totaled $707,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rouse Farms | Luray, SC 29932 | $65,379 |
2 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $60,343 |
3 | Corrin F Bowers And Son | Luray, SC 29932 | $55,689 |
4 | T & J Partnership | Estill, SC 29918 | $40,062 |
5 | Griner Farms | Varnville, SC 29944 | $32,855 |
6 | C & C Farms Of Brunson | Brunson, SC 29911 | $31,230 |
7 | Carrollton Farms | Furman, SC 29921 | $26,541 |
8 | Robert E Crosby | Estill, SC 29918 | $22,732 |
9 | L H Youmans Jr Robert A Youmans Sr | Furman, SC 29921 | $22,418 |
10 | Jimmie Mcmillan | Brunson, SC 29911 | $20,839 |
11 | Patterson Farms | Garnett, SC 29922 | $20,355 |
12 | Mole Farms | Brunson, SC 29911 | $18,020 |
13 | Mt Carmel LLC | Estill, SC 29918 | $17,016 |
14 | D H Jarrell Farm Partnership | Varnville, SC 29944 | $15,285 |
15 | Coosaw Ag LLC | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $12,354 |
16 | Det Bowers Jr | Columbia, SC 29204 | $11,357 |
17 | Charles A Laffitte Jr | Hampton, SC 29924 | $10,950 |
18 | Tony E Jarrell | Hampton, SC 29924 | $10,682 |
19 | Youmans Farms Inc | Furman, SC 29921 | $10,056 |
20 | John A Hiers III | Hampton, SC 29924 | $9,347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>