Farm Subsidy information
7th District of South Carolina
(Rep. Tim Rice)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 11,514
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $396,364,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thaddeus Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $1,129,999 |
62 | William Andrew Burroughs | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $1,118,134 |
63 | William A Hinson Jr | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $1,092,922 |
64 | D D C Coleman Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $1,091,430 |
65 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $1,074,473 |
66 | Mack Junior Rabon | Aynor, SC 29511 | $1,058,680 |
67 | Timmy R Elliott | Nichols, SC 29581 | $1,048,027 |
68 | Gaddys Mill Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $1,032,147 |
69 | Jackie M Polston | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $1,031,710 |
70 | E Michael Otuel III | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $1,023,037 |
71 | Steven Neal Baxley Jr | Marion, SC 29571 | $1,003,639 |
72 | Legette Farms | Marion, SC 29571 | $993,648 |
73 | Drew Farms 2 | Mullins, SC 29574 | $989,296 |
74 | Pressley Johnson | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $982,836 |
75 | Michael And Tony Poston Partners | Mullins, SC 29574 | $981,699 |
76 | Billy Wayne Stalvey Jr | Loris, SC 29569 | $981,311 |
77 | Duff M Williams | Nichols, SC 29581 | $980,512 |
78 | Rogers Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $978,799 |
79 | E M Otuel | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $969,046 |
80 | Hubbard W Mcdonald Sr | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $961,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”