Total Commodity Programs in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 10,681

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $302,584,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$7,481,826
2Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$5,900,565
3Glasdrum FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$4,873,252
4Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$4,582,874
5Betty Allen FarmsLatta, SC 29565$4,490,300
6Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$3,844,095
7Oneal BrosBlenheim, SC 29516$3,672,631
8W G Tatum FarmMc Coll, SC 29570$3,242,398
9Douglas H & Margaret H NewtonClio, SC 29525$3,055,960
10Baxley & Baxley FarmsDillon, SC 29536$3,054,685
11Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$2,971,812
12J Allan Mcdonald FarmsTatum, SC 29594$2,959,564
13Lee FarmsBennettsville, SC 29512$2,545,260
14Little Pee Dee FarmsDillon, SC 29536$2,537,717
15William C Covington JrClio, SC 29525$2,396,013
16Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$2,375,218
17Bryant Farms IncDillon, SC 29536$2,356,096
18Mccoll Brothers FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$2,353,953
19Floyd Johnson JrLatta, SC 29565$2,070,353
20The Promise Land Stillwell FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$2,025,821

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag