Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 489

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $12,034,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2021
1Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$374,651
2Squires Brothers FarmsAynor, SC 29511$269,714
3Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$256,994
4Bentwood Farms LLCMonroe, NC 28110$250,000
5Larry Stephen RabonGalivants Ferry, SC 29544$221,243
6Glasdrum FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$205,835
7Gregory Harold HugginsNichols, SC 29581$149,076
8Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$148,161
9Alan Gray BurroughsBlenheim, SC 29516$142,614
10Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$136,256
11Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price FarmsDillon, SC 29536$135,024
12Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$132,068
13Kayson T StricklandNichols, SC 29581$129,434
14William H Durant IIAynor, SC 29511$126,475
15Daniel B WinburnAynor, SC 29511$122,432
16Hammond Farm 2Nichols, SC 29581$120,534
17Jmh Farms LLCBennettsville, SC 29512$120,227
18Matthew H BrownConway, SC 29526$114,699
19Oneal Planting CoBlenheim, SC 29516$111,866
20Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$110,696

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag