Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,742

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $20,924,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2021
21Cargile Cattle Company LLCSan Angelo, TX 76903$98,017
22Hector B CarmonaMiles, TX 76861$97,878
23Eddie YoungSan Angelo, TX 76906$92,041
24Grooms Seed Cleaning Dba Grooms FarmsBrownwood, TX 76804$91,449
25Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$89,682
26Robert Frank ZeschSan Angelo, TX 76902$87,659
27Calvin W McgowanSan Angelo, TX 76901$87,233
28Jr Engineering & Construction IncCarlsbad, NM 88221$85,379
29Mays Ranching Co IncRichland Springs, TX 76871$81,050
30Koenig & Koenig CattleCross Plains, TX 76443$80,239
31Lone Wolf Operations Unlimited LLCWater Valley, TX 76958$76,944
32Paul N Williams JrBronte, TX 76933$76,451
33A & B Weishuhn PartnersVancourt, TX 76955$75,129
34Twin Farms IncSan Angelo, TX 76904$74,038
35Lipan Farms IncSan Angelo, TX 76904$72,829
36Larson 5l Cattle LLCShavano Park, TX 78249$71,503
37Poverty Canyon Ranch LLCSan Angelo, TX 76906$68,324
38Justin D StrubeWall, TX 76957$68,197
39A Clay KemperOdessa, TX 79765$68,038
40Holley KemperOdessa, TX 79765$68,038

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag