Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,322

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $3,439,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
2021
1Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$89,343
2Horwood Ranch CoSterling City, TX 76951$82,324
3Jeff T BaconCisco, TX 76437$64,337
4Bacon Brothers LpEastland, TX 76448$52,435
5Grooms Seed Cleaning Dba Grooms FarmsBrownwood, TX 76804$35,504
6Lipan Cattle Feeders, LLCVeribest, TX 76886$34,692
7J P Family Limited PartnershipSan Angelo, TX 76903$33,934
8Hudson Crowsnest Ranch Lp Dba Hudson RanchMiles, TX 76861$32,892
9Mays Ranching Co IncRichland Springs, TX 76871$31,616
10Lone Wolf Operations Unlimited LLCWater Valley, TX 76958$30,268
11Cargile Cattle Company LLCSan Angelo, TX 76903$30,048
12Eddie YoungSan Angelo, TX 76906$24,735
13Robert Frank ZeschSan Angelo, TX 76902$24,409
14Jr Engineering & Construction Inc Dba Richardson CCarbon, TX 76435$22,812
15David & Carl Whitworth Partnership, Whitworth RancDoole, TX 76836$21,441
16Harrison Land & Cattle Co IncCisco, TX 76437$21,281
17Pasche Land & CattleMelvin, TX 76858$21,264
18Roger StrubeWall, TX 76957$20,550
19Bar V Livestock LLCRowena, TX 76875$19,723
20Kris Wayne SciternGorman, TX 76454$19,666

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag