Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez), 1995-2020‡
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 310
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez) totaled $2,121,000 in from 1995-2020‡.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chapotal Farms * | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $142,796 |
| 2 | Skalitsky Farms Ptn * | Donna, TX 78537 | $133,534 |
| 3 | Srs Farms * | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $127,365 |
| 4 | Harbison Farms Ptns * | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $65,847 |
| 5 | Reid Farms Ptns * | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $65,588 |
| 6 | H K Ranch II * | Mission, TX 78572 | $56,914 |
| 7 | Mozingo Farms * | La Villa, TX 78562 | $52,064 |
| 8 | Michael & Elizabeth England Jv * | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $51,590 |
| 9 | Skalitsky Bros Farms * | Edcouch, TX 78538 | $42,273 |
| 10 | Teplicek Farms * | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $40,100 |
| 11 | White Rock Farms * | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $37,327 |
| 12 | Reavis Farms Inc * | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $37,080 |
| 13 | Wayne Sojak | Mission, TX 78573 | $37,062 |
| 14 | Pawlik Farms LLC * | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $36,979 |
| 15 | H & H Farms * | Pharr, TX 78577 | $34,557 |
| 16 | Picho Farms LLC * | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $32,719 |
| 17 | P J L Farms * | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $32,543 |
| 18 | Francis Joseph Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $29,797 |
| 19 | Ortega Farms J V * | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $29,777 |
| 20 | Elizabeth Marie Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $29,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf