Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez) totaled $169,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Medio Corporation | Corpus Christi, TX 78403 | $34,804 |
2 | La Rucia Ranch Inc | Corpus Christi, TX 78412 | $31,906 |
3 | Alfonso Sanchez | Charlotte, TX 78011 | $19,230 |
4 | Ricardo Gutierrez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,946 |
5 | Humberto D Martinez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $5,797 |
6 | Ramon Ruben Garza | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $4,300 |
7 | David M Cantu | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $3,734 |
8 | Jose G Garcia | Mission, TX 78572 | $3,711 |
9 | Juan Romeo Montoya | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $3,400 |
10 | Xavier Salinas Martinez | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $3,220 |
11 | David T Garcia | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $3,027 |
12 | Amber Dawn Wright | Kingsville, TX 78363 | $2,999 |
13 | Jose Alonzo Barrera | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,895 |
14 | Elaine Bennett | Seguin, TX 78155 | $2,823 |
15 | Blas M Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,645 |
16 | Richard L Solomon | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,640 |
17 | Manuel Martinez III | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,353 |
18 | Josefita Garza | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,308 |
19 | Ermelinda Vela | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,211 |
20 | Elson Barrera | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>