Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,068

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $78,874,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2023
21Esplin Livestock LLCMount Carmel, UT 84755$518,973
22Merlin EsplinOrderville, UT 84758$518,006
23Johnson Mountain Ranch, LLCAurora, UT 84620$514,283
24E Ray Okelberry Joint VentureFountain Green, UT 84632$506,052
25Frank D VincentLeamington, UT 84638$501,054
26Todd W PhillipsEscalante, UT 84726$500,397
27Mt Pennell Cattle CompanyBicknell, UT 84715$497,384
28Halterman Livestock & Ranches LLCCoalville, UT 84017$472,238
29David G HuletSummit, UT 84772$450,194
30Frank Vincent Family Ranch Operations, LLCLeamington, UT 84638$448,625
31Hawbush Ranches L CHolden, UT 84636$448,215
32Rudger C Atkin IncSaint George, UT 84790$433,865
33Bar Backward C Group LLCSalina, UT 84654$426,446
34Johnson Livestock Oak RanchAurora, UT 84620$424,793
35William Roy TalbotGreenwich, UT 84732$416,187
36C & L Farm & Cattle LLCEnterprise, UT 84725$384,230
37Wasden Ranch LLCAurora, UT 84620$376,319
38Fenton BowlerVeyo, UT 84782$364,556
39Andrew G TaftBicknell, UT 84715$363,266
40Gubler Ranch LLCSanta Clara, UT 84765$361,567

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag