Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 623

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $14,480,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
2021
1Castle Rock Land & LivestockNorth Salt Lake, UT 84054$353,601
2Baker Ranches IncBaker, NV 89311$235,750
3Platt Livestock LLCNewcastle, UT 84756$235,750
4Frank Vincent Family Ranch Operations, LLCLeamington, UT 84638$212,875
5Pearsons RanchMinersville, UT 84752$179,154
6Rudger C Atkin IncSaint George, UT 84790$177,443
7Clark And Shirley Bradshaw Family Lmtd PtnrBeaver, UT 84713$177,260
8Obr Joint VentureGoshen, UT 84633$167,766
9Clark BrothersCedar City, UT 84721$167,482
10Gubler Ranch LLCSanta Clara, UT 84765$156,478
11Arlin S HughesVeyo, UT 84782$156,473
12Rodney CarterMinersville, UT 84752$154,341
13Titmus Family Farms LLCGrantsville, UT 84029$138,570
14Finlinson Land & Livestock LLCOak City, UT 84649$132,881
15Plateau Ranches LLCKanab, UT 84741$120,806
16Brb Livestock CoSandy, UT 84070$118,573
17Wood BrosLyman, UT 84749$117,875
18Wintch Livestock CompanyManti, UT 84642$117,875
19Heaton Cattle Company LLCSaint George, UT 84791$117,875
20Gurney Cattle Company LLCAurora, UT 84620$117,875

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag