Total Subsidies in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,291

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $198,160,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Cloverfield EnterprisesChamplain, VA 22438$4,396,028
2Agri-landCenter Cross, VA 22437$3,757,484
3Philip Minor FarmsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,938,786
4James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,652,241
5Herbert Wilkerson & Son IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$2,627,888
6Harris Farms IncHeathsville, VA 22473$2,252,816
7Welch Farms IncKilmarnock, VA 22482$2,117,686
8Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$2,109,012
9David A Hudnall SrHeathsville, VA 22473$1,959,937
10W H Bray & Sons IncorporatedUrbanna, VA 23175$1,956,513
11Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,952,649
12Benjamin B Ellis IncChamplain, VA 22438$1,878,424
13J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$1,846,401
14Sanford Farms IncTappahannock, VA 22560$1,711,480
15Haynie Farms LLCHeathsville, VA 22473$1,688,332
16Brooks Farm LLCTappahannock, VA 22560$1,667,756
17Fairview Farms IncKinsale, VA 22488$1,664,965
18C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, DunkSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,607,827
19Bearcroft Farms IncLottsburg, VA 22511$1,561,173
20Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,530,053

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag