Loan Deficiency in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 707

Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $30,070,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Loan Deficiency
1995-2021
1Philip Minor FarmsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$849,941
2Agri-landCenter Cross, VA 22437$680,611
3James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$490,974
4James C HaileDunnsville, VA 22454$464,189
5Harris Farms IncHeathsville, VA 22473$433,937
6Kermit P Thomas JrPort Royal, VA 22535$422,862
7C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, DunkSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$386,411
8W H Bray & Sons IncorporatedUrbanna, VA 23175$374,680
9Cloverfield Farms IncChamplain, VA 22438$373,963
10Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$342,973
11J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$337,783
12Herbert Wilkerson & Son IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$331,254
13William F Deitz IIIHeathsville, VA 22473$316,302
14Welch Farms IncKilmarnock, VA 22482$287,654
15Frederick J DowningLottsburg, VA 22511$285,212
16David A Hudnall SrHeathsville, VA 22473$278,447
17Hundley Farms IncChamplain, VA 22438$275,860
18Fairview Farms IncKinsale, VA 22488$272,136
19Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$261,792
20Douglas F SanfordMontross, VA 22520$259,747

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag