Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 565
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $1,262,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ernest E Copenhaver Jr | Meadowview, VA 24361 | $3,156 |
102 | Earl Pierce | Fries, VA 24330 | $3,136 |
103 | Raymond Johnson | Castlewood, VA 24224 | $3,085 |
104 | Charlie Osborne | Castlewood, VA 24224 | $3,074 |
105 | Wolfpen Farm LLC | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $3,070 |
106 | Charles Livesay | Ewing, VA 24248 | $3,068 |
107 | Steve A Powers | Meadowview, VA 24361 | $3,063 |
108 | Rolfe H Yarber | Meadowview, VA 24361 | $3,051 |
109 | Maude Debusk | Rose Hill, VA 24281 | $3,038 |
110 | James Giles Realty Corp | New Tazewell, TN 37825 | $2,994 |
111 | Delmar R Thompson Jr | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $2,978 |
112 | Jack Gibson | Castlewood, VA 24224 | $2,960 |
113 | Roger Fields | Abingdon, VA 24211 | $2,925 |
114 | Thomas Delp | Independence, VA 24348 | $2,921 |
115 | Liberty Farms LLC | Stuart, VA 24171 | $2,897 |
116 | James Flynn Harrell | Meadows Of Dan, VA 24120 | $2,891 |
117 | Edward Jones | Rose Hill, VA 24281 | $2,880 |
118 | Joe Marshall | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $2,879 |
119 | Jackie Ray Moore | Blackwater, VA 24221 | $2,879 |
120 | New Garden Farms | Honaker, VA 24260 | $2,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”