Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,952
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $37,679,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $1,231,593 |
| 2 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $801,491 |
| 3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $708,650 |
| 4 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $671,582 |
| 5 | Greene Ridge Farms | Asotin, WA 99402 | $384,422 |
| 6 | Emtman Bros Farms Jv | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $368,291 |
| 7 | Seney Land & Livestock Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $364,894 |
| 8 | Ely Ranches | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $336,610 |
| 9 | T & T Jv | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $324,255 |
| 10 | Goose Flat Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $303,532 |
| 11 | Pearl Farms LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $303,212 |
| 12 | Double D Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $295,405 |
| 13 | Archer Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $282,075 |
| 14 | Wilson Hollow Farms, LLC | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $280,708 |
| 15 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $262,653 |
| 16 | Barker Enterprises Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $258,733 |
| 17 | Becker Ranch | Genesee, ID 83832 | $244,512 |
| 18 | Wheatland Bank ** | Davenport, WA 99122 | $233,328 |
| 19 | Dixon Land And Livestock Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $228,327 |
| 20 | Wp Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $222,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf