Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 6th District of Washington (Rep. Derek Kilmer), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 283
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 6th District of Washington (Rep. Derek Kilmer) totaled $3,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | George Charles Hill Jr | Indianola, WA 98342 | $17,866 |
42 | Thomas C Nelsen | Bremerton, WA 98312 | $17,434 |
43 | Philip R Holt Jr | Port Orchard, WA 98367 | $17,313 |
44 | Victor S Cramer Inc | Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 | $17,300 |
45 | Duane D Aikman Jr | Kingston, WA 98346 | $17,248 |
46 | Joseph B Luce Sr | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $17,101 |
47 | Nathaniel D Olson | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $16,691 |
48 | Mad Jax Seafood Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $16,355 |
49 | Derek Sanderson | Sequim, WA 98382 | $16,092 |
50 | F/v Barnacle Bill Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $15,965 |
51 | , | $15,929 | |
52 | Hakwa Chiquiti | Kingston, WA 98346 | $15,901 |
53 | Tyler Lucas George | Poulsbo, WA 98370 | $15,818 |
54 | Edward V Johnson | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $15,644 |
55 | Mark Norbisrath | Beaver, WA 98305 | $15,486 |
56 | Clausen Fisheries Inc | Port Townsend, WA 98368 | $15,014 |
57 | Steven Lee Holt | Bremerton, WA 98312 | $14,753 |
58 | Thomas Reamer Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $14,478 |
59 | Steinbit LLC | Bremerton, WA 98312 | $14,116 |
60 | Alex Gaschk | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $13,762 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”