Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 6th District of Washington (Rep. Derek Kilmer), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 237
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 6th District of Washington (Rep. Derek Kilmer) totaled $2,751,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | David C Sigo Sr | Suquamish, WA 98392 | $3,616 |
142 | Trentin Cole Moss | Suquamish, WA 98392 | $3,577 |
143 | John Bagley | Poulsbo, WA 98370 | $3,551 |
144 | Duna Fisheries LLC | Port Townsend, WA 98368 | $3,506 |
145 | Michael Buckingham | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $3,442 |
146 | Rudolph Scott Wellman | Kingston, WA 98346 | $3,339 |
147 | Roland A Gagnon Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $3,303 |
148 | Michael Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,957 |
149 | Jeanette Morningstarr Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,841 |
150 | Randolph L Wellman | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,827 |
151 | Neil Lyons Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,801 |
152 | Desiree Sullivan | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,781 |
153 | Robert Whiteshield Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,773 |
154 | Joseph A Daniels | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,766 |
155 | Jennifer Hess | Port Orchard, WA 98367 | $2,751 |
156 | Barry A Fulton | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,666 |
157 | Joshua John Smith | Suquamish, WA 98392 | $2,623 |
158 | Jeromy Thomas Jones | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,620 |
159 | Luther F Mills III | Indianola, WA 98342 | $2,607 |
160 | Christopher Ronald Jones | Kingston, WA 98346 | $2,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”