Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 677
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $10,857,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Demant | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $46,189 |
62 | Alice Everts | Salem, WI 53168 | $44,319 |
63 | John Shea & Laurel Shea Revocable Living Trust | Chaseburg, WI 54621 | $44,302 |
64 | Frank Habschied | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $44,300 |
65 | Ralph Rice | Burlington, WI 53105 | $43,926 |
66 | Charles E Toelle | Watertown, WI 53094 | $43,875 |
67 | Donald F And Virginia M Koldeway Joint Rev Living | Burlington, WI 53105 | $43,378 |
68 | Cep Corporation | Burlington, WI 53105 | $43,065 |
69 | William Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $43,011 |
70 | Racine County | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $42,891 |
71 | Colin Sadler | Franksville, WI 53126 | $42,515 |
72 | Thomas M Werth | Bristol, WI 53104 | $42,409 |
73 | Louie E Orlando | Franksville, WI 53126 | $42,214 |
74 | Daniel D Strasser | Waterford, WI 53185 | $42,145 |
75 | Dan Neider | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $41,108 |
76 | Bartlett Richards | Northfield, IL 60093 | $40,436 |
77 | Beverly Rehbein | Racine, WI 53402 | $40,343 |
78 | Noble Grain Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $39,105 |
79 | Wayne Fasciano | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $39,031 |
80 | R & C Weis Farms LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $39,011 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”