Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 112
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $199,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jeffery L Paap | Franksville, WI 53126 | $372 |
82 | Neil Young | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $361 |
83 | Daniel Hintz | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $344 |
84 | Dwight Dreger | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $343 |
85 | Wayne Fasciano | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $338 |
86 | Robert Ryterski Jr | Franksville, WI 53126 | $330 |
87 | Bart Ament | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $316 |
88 | Vyvyan Farms LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $308 |
89 | Michael J Nolan | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $280 |
90 | Brian W And Jennifer J Diener Revocable Trust | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $264 |
91 | Robert Vyvyan Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $254 |
92 | Ralph Wagner | Racine, WI 53406 | $250 |
93 | Howard Zabler | Burlington, WI 53105 | $244 |
94 | Benedict Farm LLC | Bristol, WI 53104 | $235 |
95 | Ronald Schaetten | Salem, WI 53168 | $233 |
96 | Randall H Borri | Salem, WI 53168 | $228 |
97 | Krsto Kovacevic | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $207 |
98 | Clark Kosinski | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $199 |
99 | Rowntree Farms Inc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $167 |
100 | John P Lourigan | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”