Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Gila County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $5,690,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Point Of Pines Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $618,695 |
2 | John L Johnson | Young, AZ 85554 | $502,483 |
3 | Ash Creek Grazing Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $493,712 |
4 | Griffin Cattle Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $444,294 |
5 | Slaughter Mountain Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $241,053 |
6 | Tw Land And Livestock LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85014 | $236,780 |
7 | Anchor Seven Livestock Associatio | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $185,377 |
8 | Carrizo Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $170,515 |
9 | North Fork Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $161,379 |
10 | Tonto Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $146,810 |
11 | J Bar B Cattle Co | Phoenix, AZ 85042 | $142,264 |
12 | Michael A Oddonetto | Globe, AZ 85501 | $131,862 |
13 | Arthur F Rivera | Claypool, AZ 85532 | $126,634 |
14 | Rockin Four Ranch LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85009 | $116,913 |
15 | Turkey Creek Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $109,723 |
16 | Erickson Family Trust | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $108,391 |
17 | Troy Neal | Payson, AZ 85541 | $86,638 |
18 | M-lazy-s Cattle Company Inc | Young, AZ 85554 | $86,192 |
19 | White Mountain Apache Tribe | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $80,553 |
20 | Point Of Pines Livestock Associat | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $79,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>