Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Gila County, Arizona, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $5,690,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2021
1Point Of Pines Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$618,695
2John L JohnsonYoung, AZ 85554$502,483
3Ash Creek Grazing AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$493,712
4Griffin Cattle Ranch LLCGlobe, AZ 85502$444,294
5Slaughter Mountain Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$241,053
6Tw Land And Livestock LLCPhoenix, AZ 85014$236,780
7Anchor Seven Livestock AssociatioSan Carlos, AZ 85550$185,377
8Carrizo Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$170,515
9North Fork Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$161,379
10Tonto Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$146,810
11J Bar B Cattle CoPhoenix, AZ 85042$142,264
12Michael A OddonettoGlobe, AZ 85501$131,862
13Arthur F RiveraClaypool, AZ 85532$126,634
14Rockin Four Ranch LLCPhoenix, AZ 85009$116,913
15Turkey Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$109,723
16Erickson Family TrustParadise Valley, AZ 85253$108,391
17Troy NealPayson, AZ 85541$86,638
18M-lazy-s Cattle Company IncYoung, AZ 85554$86,192
19White Mountain Apache TribeWhiteriver, AZ 85941$80,553
20Point Of Pines Livestock AssociatSan Carlos, AZ 85550$79,124

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag