Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Gila County, Arizona, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $939,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
2019
1Ash Creek Grazing AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$117,250
2Point Of Pines Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$117,250
3North Fork Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$117,250
4Carrizo Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$96,993
5Slaughter Mountain Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$90,997
6Anchor Seven Livestock AssociatioSan Carlos, AZ 85550$88,702
7White Mountain Apache TribeWhiteriver, AZ 85941$46,741
8Tonto Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$44,124
9Turkey Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$39,314
10Cedar Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$36,549
11Muleshoe X Cattle CoPine, AZ 85544$29,778
12Joshua Jesse RoundyRoosevelt, AZ 85545$25,270
13Canyon Day Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$20,228
14Forestdale Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$18,310
15Grasshopper Livestock AssociationCibecue, AZ 85911$17,886
16Page Cattle CompanyPhoenix, AZ 85037$13,306
17Cibecue Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$11,073
18Oak Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$6,772
19Rafter O Land And Cattle LLCGlobe, AZ 85501$1,131
20Melvin WarbingtonGlobe, AZ 85501$530

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag