Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Calaveras County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $291,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lewallen Land & Cattle Co | Linden, CA 95236 | $74,650 |
2 | W C Potter & Son Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $35,587 |
3 | Whittle Ranch Inc | Altaville, CA 95221 | $31,900 |
4 | Matt Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $25,410 |
5 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $24,718 |
6 | Lawrence Musachia | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $14,905 |
7 | Elliott Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $12,100 |
8 | Rock Creek Land & Cattle LLC | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $11,220 |
9 | Ron Spence | Altaville, CA 95221 | $11,000 |
10 | Michael D Fischer Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $10,350 |
11 | Donald R Whittle Jr | Altaville, CA 95221 | $10,340 |
12 | Perry Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $9,130 |
13 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $7,810 |
14 | Barbara Knowles | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $4,455 |
15 | Jon Whittle | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $3,135 |
16 | Austin Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $2,420 |
17 | Kent Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $1,320 |
18 | Mary A Tucker | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $189 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”