Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Calaveras County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $480,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lemhi Land & Cattle LLC | Stockton, CA 95215 | $79,280 |
2 | Walter Valente Jr | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $74,855 |
3 | Thomas Whittle | Altaville, CA 95221 | $37,707 |
4 | Nicolas V Valente | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $30,965 |
5 | Stan Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $21,065 |
6 | J W Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $19,030 |
7 | W C Potter & Son Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $18,383 |
8 | Steven Wooster | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $17,710 |
9 | Wilbur Hightower | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $17,249 |
10 | Sandra Rader | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $15,620 |
11 | Russell Stephens | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $13,135 |
12 | Robert Garamendi | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $10,725 |
13 | Libby Rader-kassik | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $9,695 |
14 | Roddy Scherff | Burson, CA 95225 | $9,341 |
15 | Richard Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $9,185 |
16 | Rolleri Vineyard | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $8,736 |
17 | Rasmussen Ranch LLC | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $8,635 |
18 | Rolleri Ranch | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $7,150 |
19 | John Davies | Avery, CA 95224 | $6,710 |
20 | Mattley Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $6,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>