Total Commodity Programs in Colusa County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,157
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $813,867,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary & Juelene Driver | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $3,349,011 |
22 | Lagrande Farms | Williams, CA 95987 | $3,304,459 |
23 | L & M Farms | Williams, CA 95987 | $3,244,926 |
24 | Victoria Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $3,210,325 |
25 | Struckmeyer Brothers | Colusa, CA 95932 | $3,141,810 |
26 | Strain And Strain | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $3,022,451 |
27 | Rancho Lohola | San Francisco, CA 94116 | $2,958,228 |
28 | Mcgeoghegan Farming Venture | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $2,946,822 |
29 | Myers Seed | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,867,599 |
30 | Schaad Ranch | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $2,822,286 |
31 | Davis Ranches-sycamore | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,798,771 |
32 | Bob Freed Farming | Williams, CA 95987 | $2,785,818 |
33 | Jeff And Gina Moresco | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,780,108 |
34 | Ktn Joint Venture | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $2,768,458 |
35 | Colusa Consolidated Growers | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,763,272 |
36 | Michael V Lagrande Dba Viking Ranch | Williams, CA 95987 | $2,754,700 |
37 | Hickel & Hickel | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,718,480 |
38 | Steidlmayer Joint Venture | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,698,665 |
39 | Cjc Farms Joint Venture | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,512,722 |
40 | Erdman Sisters | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $2,509,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”