Farm Subsidy information
Mendocino County, California
Total Subsidies in Mendocino County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 59 of 59
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $3,933,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Armando Ruiz | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $5,646 |
| 42 | William R Taylor | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,416 |
| 43 | Dennis R Patton | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $5,159 |
| 44 | Sonya Campbell | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $4,930 |
| 45 | Clara A Chapman | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $4,545 |
| 46 | Robin Danelle Laughlin | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $2,813 |
| 47 | C Randall Krag | Witter Springs, CA 95493 | $2,734 |
| 48 | Daniel D Springer | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $2,049 |
| 49 | Helen M Wagner | Hopland, CA 95449 | $1,771 |
| 50 | Henry A Gaska | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $1,650 |
| 51 | David C Mostin | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $1,618 |
| 52 | Shawn Paul Beverlin | Kelseyville, CA 95451 | $1,240 |
| 53 | Keith Miller | Finley, CA 95435 | $1,016 |
| 54 | Mitchell Champi | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $874 |
| 55 | Arthur Grothe | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $825 |
| 56 | Johnson Family Ranch, Inc. | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $808 |
| 57 | Tom Johnson | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $628 |
| 58 | Jarn Chun | San Leandro, CA 94577 | $532 |
| 59 | Bree Klotter | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf