Livestock Forage Disaster Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 356
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $16,018,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Onderdonk Spring Ranch LLC | Pasadena, CA 91105 | $169,043 |
| 22 | Molnar Cattle LLC | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $165,317 |
| 23 | Robert Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $163,023 |
| 24 | Marcia C Rudnick | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $162,150 |
| 25 | Jean Louis Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $158,333 |
| 26 | Larry E Fiscalini | Cambria, CA 93428 | $157,153 |
| 27 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $156,457 |
| 28 | Green Valley Cattle Company Lp | Cambria, CA 93428 | $155,411 |
| 29 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $152,109 |
| 30 | Ruffoni Ranch Partnership | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $150,880 |
| 31 | Stephen R Onderdonk | Pasadena, CA 91105 | $148,940 |
| 32 | Diane Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $144,162 |
| 33 | Teixeira Cattle Company Gp | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $143,527 |
| 34 | Tom Block | Shandon, CA 93461 | $140,501 |
| 35 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $137,451 |
| 36 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $137,451 |
| 37 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $132,258 |
| 38 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $129,302 |
| 39 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $127,943 |
| 40 | Alison Grantham | Templeton, CA 93465 | $121,788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf