Livestock Forage Disaster Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 168
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,969,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Justin Rhoades | Cambria, CA 93428 | $117,875 |
| 2 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $102,565 |
| 3 | Carrizo Cattle LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $80,806 |
| 4 | White/grantham Livestock | Creston, CA 93432 | $54,492 |
| 5 | Scribner Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $46,256 |
| 6 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $43,260 |
| 7 | Green Valley Cattle Company Lp | Cambria, CA 93428 | $41,897 |
| 8 | Onderdonk Spring Ranch LLC | Pasadena, CA 91105 | $40,013 |
| 9 | Marcia C Rudnick | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $39,798 |
| 10 | 4 Lazy P Cattle Company | Templeton, CA 93465 | $37,044 |
| 11 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $36,780 |
| 12 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $34,478 |
| 13 | Mello Land And Cattle LLC | San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 | $33,009 |
| 14 | J B Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $32,626 |
| 15 | Rj Livestock LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $29,761 |
| 16 | Santa Margarita Cattle Company LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $26,238 |
| 17 | J & V Sill Family Trust | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $25,557 |
| 18 | Molnar Cattle LLC | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $24,367 |
| 19 | Robert Soto | Cambria, CA 93428 | $22,967 |
| 20 | Old Creek Ranch Inc | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $22,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf