Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sutter County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $527,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dale Investments LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $192,920 |
| 2 | Sundeep Dale | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $141,240 |
| 3 | Dale Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $126,581 |
| 4 | Nicoli Nicholas Sr | Sacramento, CA 95819 | $12,906 |
| 5 | Anthony Alves | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $10,648 |
| 6 | Nicoli G Nicholas Jr | Woodland, CA 95776 | $7,764 |
| 7 | Mcpherrin-damboriena Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $5,197 |
| 8 | Pomeroy Ranches | Gridley, CA 95948 | $3,924 |
| 9 | Tim Garner Dba Garnerranch | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $3,877 |
| 10 | Lori Correll | Sutter, CA 95982 | $3,868 |
| 11 | David R Dillabo | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $3,855 |
| 12 | Circle S Ranch | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $3,625 |
| 13 | Richard & Geraldine Libby Trust | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,547 |
| 14 | Richard W Powell Revocable Trust | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,183 |
| 15 | Tarke Ranch LLC | Sutter, CA 95982 | $1,862 |
| 16 | Pelican Farms LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,520 |
| 17 | Callie Mcarthur | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $809 |
| 18 | Milton Greathouse | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $605 |
| 19 | Swainson Farms Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $550 |
| 20 | Teri Cah0on | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf