Total Commodity Programs in Hawaii County, Hawaii, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 550
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hawaii County, Hawaii totaled $13,509,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ponoholo Ranch Ltd | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $645,633 |
2 | Kawamata Farms LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $409,001 |
3 | Kuahiwi Contractors Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $360,014 |
4 | Green Point Nurseries Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $314,100 |
5 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $289,138 |
6 | Kahua Ranch Limited | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $263,673 |
7 | Peter Schonberg | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $250,000 |
8 | Purdyco Ltd Dba Island Princess | Honolulu, HI 96819 | $250,000 |
9 | Jurahame A Garcia Leyva - Orchidf | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $219,735 |
10 | Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises Inc | Hawi, HI 96719 | $213,200 |
11 | American Pacific Inc Internationa | Ninole, HI 96773 | $212,259 |
12 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $210,173 |
13 | Palani Ranch Company Inc | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $202,965 |
14 | Island Harvest Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $194,881 |
15 | S C Ranch Co Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $192,574 |
16 | E11even Season Produce LLC | Keaau, HI 96749 | $183,308 |
17 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $179,222 |
18 | Hilo Orchid Farm Hawaii Inc | Mountain View, HI 96771 | $166,674 |
19 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $158,940 |
20 | Hawaii Island Honey Co LLC | Hilo, HI 96721 | $155,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>