Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Putnam County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 156
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Putnam County, Indiana totaled $3,273,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael Martin | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $8,787 |
62 | Sally Jo Martin | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $8,787 |
63 | Patrick J Wynne | North Salem, IN 46165 | $8,707 |
64 | Jason Clark | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $8,579 |
65 | Sheila Hughes | Providence, RI 02906 | $8,235 |
66 | Adam Dobson | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $7,945 |
67 | Jane Hughes Carlson Trust | Alexandria, VA 22301 | $7,603 |
68 | Ron Alcorn | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $7,161 |
69 | Bradfield Inc | Louisville, KY 40299 | $6,764 |
70 | Michael Hmstd Farms Inc | Baltimore, MD 21208 | $6,522 |
71 | Douglas Johnstone | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $5,782 |
72 | Margaret C Williams | North Salem, IN 46165 | $5,120 |
73 | Frances Joan Alcorn | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $4,703 |
74 | Harold Alcorn | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $4,688 |
75 | Thomas G Herbert And Edna L Herbert Revocable Livi | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $4,599 |
76 | Betty Evans White | Saint Louis, MO 63124 | $4,201 |
77 | Putnam County Farm LLC | Porter, IN 46304 | $4,060 |
78 | Noble Costin | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $3,883 |
79 | Beverly Arnold | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $3,763 |
80 | Ryan Clark | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $3,436 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”