Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Whitley County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 388
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $8,303,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $298,154 |
2 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $257,600 |
3 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $247,239 |
4 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $228,512 |
5 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $226,174 |
6 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $143,689 |
7 | Richard Cox | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $142,618 |
8 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $142,075 |
9 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $133,538 |
10 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $132,600 |
11 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $130,936 |
12 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $127,824 |
13 | Sonrise Pork LLC | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $125,000 |
14 | Pg Frazier Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $124,277 |
15 | Douglas L Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $115,766 |
16 | Kevin E Bollinger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $106,794 |
17 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $103,905 |
18 | D & R Farms And Sons, LLC | Larwill, IN 46764 | $103,750 |
19 | Thomas Henney | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $96,360 |
20 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $95,867 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>