Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Whitley County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 378
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $2,338,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $104,864 |
2 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $102,261 |
3 | Sonrise Pork LLC | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $82,702 |
4 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $45,580 |
5 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $44,200 |
6 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $44,200 |
7 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $44,001 |
8 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $43,645 |
9 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $42,608 |
10 | Kevin E Bollinger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $35,598 |
11 | D & R Farms And Sons, LLC | Larwill, IN 46764 | $34,583 |
12 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $33,725 |
13 | More Family Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $31,950 |
14 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $31,156 |
15 | Jeffrey D Johnson | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $29,584 |
16 | Woll Family Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $28,936 |
17 | Chris Long Farms | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $28,567 |
18 | Daryl Sheiss | Larwill, IN 46764 | $27,813 |
19 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $27,271 |
20 | Brent Kyle Emerick | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $27,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>