Farm Subsidy information
Worcester County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Worcester County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 303
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $6,688,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $413,573 |
2 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $258,194 |
3 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $252,811 |
4 | Holland Land Company | New Church, VA 23415 | $217,507 |
5 | F A Holland & Sons | New Church, VA 23415 | $211,892 |
6 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $194,461 |
7 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $186,836 |
8 | H Watson Powell Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $177,635 |
9 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $166,524 |
10 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $156,054 |
11 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $146,848 |
12 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $125,208 |
13 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $119,927 |
14 | Twin Oak Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $97,323 |
15 | B & R Farms LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $87,149 |
16 | Watson Powell Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $85,380 |
17 | Estate Of Richard E Jones | Columbia, MD 21045 | $84,816 |
18 | George H Dryden Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $83,908 |
19 | Holloway Brothers | Berlin, MD 21811 | $81,039 |
20 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $75,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>