Total Disaster Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 189
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $3,277,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jacob Allan Woolverton | Gideon, MO 63848 | $20,348 |
42 | Kathryn Elizabeth Mitchell | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $20,312 |
43 | William David Rogers | Matthews, MO 63867 | $18,779 |
44 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $18,165 |
45 | Ryan Brandon Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $17,696 |
46 | Elizabeth Ann Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $17,696 |
47 | , | $17,582 | |
48 | Scott Lacewell | Malden, MO 63863 | $17,331 |
49 | Murphy Grain LLC | Malden, MO 63863 | $17,310 |
50 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $17,053 |
51 | Toni Lynne Lawfield | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $16,435 |
52 | Michael E Richards | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $15,687 |
53 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $14,978 |
54 | Derek Wayne Lawfield | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $14,291 |
55 | William Lee Wescoat | Matthews, MO 63867 | $13,880 |
56 | Charles J Smith | Malden, MO 63863 | $13,733 |
57 | Randy Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $13,523 |
58 | P And C Planting Company, LLC | Matthews, MO 63867 | $13,331 |
59 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $12,830 |
60 | Richard T Weeks | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $12,129 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”