Total Disaster Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,379
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $22,056,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $344,441 |
2 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $302,779 |
3 | Grm Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $297,484 |
4 | Trey Lawfield Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $296,279 |
5 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $287,685 |
6 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $286,862 |
7 | Jarrett Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $260,104 |
8 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $242,529 |
9 | Ryan Brandon Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $222,919 |
10 | Milus Gary Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $202,982 |
11 | Vernon Ray Fowler | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $189,496 |
12 | Tim Murphy Farms LLC | Bernie, MO 63822 | $182,182 |
13 | Drew Michael Murphy | Malden, MO 63863 | $172,802 |
14 | Elizabeth Ann Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $171,995 |
15 | Bill Turner | Gideon, MO 63848 | $164,464 |
16 | Virgil W Lawfield | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $163,336 |
17 | Earnest Lee Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $159,046 |
18 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $155,736 |
19 | Robert Henry | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $148,307 |
20 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $148,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>