Total Disaster Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 148
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $1,974,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $95,682 |
2 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $95,659 |
3 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $93,786 |
4 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $82,885 |
5 | Quadray Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $75,399 |
6 | Bean Farms Partnership | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $69,006 |
7 | Steve & Lynn Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $61,580 |
8 | Gary Murphy Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $50,935 |
9 | Barry Richardson III | Marston, MO 63866 | $47,777 |
10 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $43,487 |
11 | Gary Lee Kenedy | Matthews, MO 63867 | $40,644 |
12 | Jarrett Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $39,838 |
13 | Martin & Karen Smelser Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $35,024 |
14 | Dean And Kathie Stevens Farms LLC | Malden, MO 63863 | $30,548 |
15 | Randy Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $29,284 |
16 | Brian Shramek Farms | Kingdom City, MO 65262 | $28,626 |
17 | Steven Richard Scherer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $28,534 |
18 | Feezor Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $27,963 |
19 | Tnr Farming Partnership | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $27,801 |
20 | Deline Farms North | Charleston, MO 63834 | $27,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>