Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 880
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $29,604,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $3,150,296 |
2 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,587,362 |
3 | Rone Farm Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $966,274 |
4 | Ddab Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $838,060 |
5 | Robinson Bros | Cooter, MO 63839 | $753,705 |
6 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $532,147 |
7 | M & K Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $492,079 |
8 | Steven M Walker Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $481,388 |
9 | S & L Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $466,922 |
10 | Storey Family Farms Arkansas LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $448,802 |
11 | Earl Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $446,896 |
12 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $432,806 |
13 | T & P Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $415,865 |
14 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $396,792 |
15 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $391,576 |
16 | Michael Bernard Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $389,488 |
17 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $381,346 |
18 | 3- C Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $334,443 |
19 | James Raulerson | Holland, MO 63853 | $307,750 |
20 | David Bond Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $303,091 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>