Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 816
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $6,078,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $719,651 |
2 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $383,902 |
3 | Rone Farm Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $174,507 |
4 | Ddab Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $150,299 |
5 | Robinson Bros | Cooter, MO 63839 | $125,062 |
6 | S & L Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $114,836 |
7 | 3- C Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $111,481 |
8 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $108,424 |
9 | Storey Family Farms Arkansas LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $104,887 |
10 | M & K Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $91,780 |
11 | Michael Bernard Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $90,368 |
12 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $88,450 |
13 | James-james B Rutledge Revocable | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $86,861 |
14 | T & P Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $84,382 |
15 | Earl Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $75,546 |
16 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $72,522 |
17 | Turnage Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $70,645 |
18 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $70,062 |
19 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $64,415 |
20 | James Raulerson | Holland, MO 63853 | $62,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>