Farm Subsidy information
Cibola County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Cibola County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 134
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cibola County, New Mexico totaled $3,781,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acoma Business Enterprises Dba Acoma Land And Catt | Pueblo Of Acoma, NM 87034 | $474,955 |
| 2 | Sedillo Cattle Association | New Laguna, NM 87038 | $126,203 |
| 3 | Fernandez Company Dba Floyd Lee Ranches | San Mateo, NM 87020 | $99,286 |
| 4 | Dough Mountain Grazing Association | Old Laguna, NM 87026 | $91,124 |
| 5 | Raymond Gonzales | Seboyeta, NM 87014 | $80,782 |
| 6 | Irvin Pablo | Grants, NM 87020 | $71,804 |
| 7 | Gary Sturm | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $71,368 |
| 8 | Cerro Verde Ranch | Gatesville, TX 76528 | $62,341 |
| 9 | Cross 5 Ranch | Valley City, ND 58072 | $60,242 |
| 10 | Danny Mirabal | Grants, NM 87020 | $58,535 |
| 11 | Acoma Cattle Growers Association | Acoma, NM 87034 | $37,140 |
| 12 | Acoma Livestock Growers Organization | Pueblo Of Acoma, NM 87034 | $28,186 |
| 13 | Cy White Ranches, LLC | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $26,975 |
| 14 | Carl Elkins | Milan, NM 87021 | $26,027 |
| 15 | Mccullough Farms - D Patrick & Marlys Mccullough | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $25,199 |
| 16 | Paul And Tammy Mandagaran Revocable Trust | Milan, NM 87021 | $23,967 |
| 17 | Lucero Brothers Ranch | Peralta, NM 87042 | $22,907 |
| 18 | Montano Ranch LLC | Gallup, NM 87305 | $21,644 |
| 19 | Nielson Family Limited Partnership No 1 | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $19,655 |
| 20 | Wes M Wengert | Bluewater, NM 87005 | $19,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf